Book a demo →
Replace Your SEG

You do not have to cut over to find out

AegisAI connects to Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace by API in about 5 minutes, no MX record change, no mail flow disruption. It runs in monitoring mode next to whatever gateway you have today, so you compare verdicts on your own mail before you touch a single routing rule.

Inbound08:14:11 · msg_51e02a1.9sec
FromAccounts Payable <ap@vend0r-remit.com>1
SubjectUpdated remittance instructions, please confirm before Friday2
Our banking details changed as of this week. Please route this invoice's payment to the new account3 below and confirm once sent. Regards, Dana Whitfield4, Accounts Receivable
Agent findings
1Domain ageSending domain registered 6 days ago, one character off your actual vendor's domain, no prior message history with this org.
2Payment intentPayment-redirection request paired with a soft deadline, a pattern matched across confirmed vendor-fraud attempts.
3Links and filesNo attachment, no link. The ask is entirely in the body text, which a rule tuned for links or attachments would not flag.
4Thread historyNo relationship between this sender and your finance team in prior send history.
AegisMalicious · vendor fraud · 0.96Pulled in 1.9s, before finance sees it
Your gatewayDeliveredSPF, DKIM, DMARC all pass; nothing in the message matches a known bad pattern
Why This Is Harder Than It Should Be

Gateway migrations get stuck in the review, not the technology

Whatever you run today, Proofpoint, Mimecast, Barracuda, Check Point Harmony, the hard part of leaving it is rarely the new product. It is the paperwork that surrounds anything sitting in the mail path. For the architecture differences by vendor, see the named gateway comparison.

01 / Change control

Change control is the real gate

Third-party involvement now features in 48% of all breaches (Verizon 2026 DBIR), so anything touching mail flow gets scrutinized before it gets approved. That review is reasonable. It should not require a cutover just to gather evidence.

02 / Inherited exceptions

Exceptions outlive their owners

Every allow-list rule and quarantine exception on a gateway needs an owner, a justification, and an expiration date before a migration can even be scoped (Security Boulevard, 2026). Most gateways in production have none of the three.

03 / Rule decay

Rules age, attacks don't

A rule tuned last quarter reflects last quarter's attacks. AegisAI reads each message on its own terms: sender history, the actual ask, where the links go, so there is no rule list to inherit or rebuild.

What Actually Happens

Your gateway stays exactly where it is

Nothing in this sequence changes routing, MX records, or your gateway's configuration.

0:00

Admin grants OAuth access

Read-only, reviewable before you approve it, revocable at any time. Your gateway keeps filtering mail exactly as configured.

~5 min

Agents go live, side by side

Aegis reads a copy of delivered mail through the platform API. Your existing gateway is untouched and still sits wherever it sits today.

Day 1

First verdicts appear

Live messages get a written verdict with reasoning attached, visible next to whatever your gateway decided about the same message.

Week 1

You start seeing the gap, if there is one

Enough live mail has passed through both systems to compare what each one caught and what each one wrongly flagged.

Your call

Decide with your own numbers

Keep both running, replace the gateway, or do neither. AegisAI runs in monitoring mode until you tell it to do otherwise.

Two Ways To Filter Mail

Rule-based filtering compared to agent reasoning

Two different architectures, described as they work. The evaluation question is which one gets your mail right, and you can answer it without changing anything.

Legacy SEG (rule-based)
AegisAI
Detection approach
Pattern and reputation matching against known-bad signatures and rule sets.
Multi-agent reasoning per message: sender history, the actual ask, and where links resolve.
False positives
Rules tuned to catch more tend to over-block; loosening them lets more through.
10x fewer false positives than rule-based filtering, Aegis-measured against rule-based filtering in customer environments.
Novel and targeted attacks
A first-seen attack that does not match an existing rule or signature is not caught by definition.
Agents build a case per message, so a first-seen attack does not need to match a known pattern to be flagged.
Deployment
Historically an inline gateway with MX record changes and a cutover window.
API-based, about 5 minutes, no MX record change, runs in monitoring mode before anything changes.
Mail-flow risk during evaluation
Comparing two inline gateways typically means a second cutover just to test.
None. Aegis reads a copy of delivered mail; your current gateway is untouched during the whole evaluation.
Explainability
A message is blocked, quarantined, or delivered without the reasoning surfaced to an admin.
Every verdict ships with the specific agent findings that produced it.
Ongoing tuning
Rule sets and allow lists need continuous maintenance by someone on your team.
Agents adapt per message. No rule list to build or maintain.

Where the two architectures genuinely differ, including against us

A gateway sits in the mail path and can stop a message pre-delivery. AegisAI does not, and we will not pretend otherwise. It connects after delivery, reads a copy of the message through the platform API, and removes a malicious one retroactively across every affected mailbox, typically pulled in 1.9s, before users see or click.

That is the trade, and it is the same property that makes this evaluation safe. Pre-delivery blocking is exactly what puts a vendor in your routing path, and being in the routing path is what turns a product decision into a cutover, a maintenance window, and a rollback plan. Nothing about running AegisAI beside your gateway is irreversible, because AegisAI was never in the delivery path to begin with.

Scope, plainly: this page is about inbound detection and triage. Outbound DLP, encryption, and content filtering are not covered here. If your gateway is doing that work today, it keeps doing it.

Change-Control Objections

What your migration review will actually ask

No. AegisAI runs in monitoring mode alongside your existing gateway. Nothing about your mail flow changes until you decide it should.

Nothing. Your gateway keeps running its own configuration. AegisAI does not import or depend on it.

No. This page is about inbound detection and triage. If your gateway is doing outbound DLP or encryption today, that stays with your gateway until you decide otherwise.

Then you keep your gateway. The evaluation is on your mail, not a reference customer's, so there is nothing to take on faith.

Revoke the OAuth grant. There is no gateway configuration or MX record to unwind on either side.

That is your call and your change-control process. AegisAI does not force a date. Monitoring mode has no expiration.

The Numbers

What agents catch that rules miss

The point of running side by side is that you get your own version of these figures.

10×
fewer false positives than rule-based filtering.
22%
more attacks blocked than incumbent tooling.
1.9s
median time from message to verdict.
Aegis-measured against rule-based filtering in customer environments.
Free assessment

See what your gateway is letting through

Connect by API in minutes, read-only. Our agents re-read the last 14 days of delivered mail and report what got through, with the reasoning behind every verdict. Free, and yours to keep.

Thanks for submitting the form.

See what AI-native security feels like

Thirty minutes. Real attacks pulled from environments like yours (BEC, vendor fraud, credential phishing) with the reasoning behind each verdict. No setup required.

Five-minute connect · monitoring mode · disconnect any time without touching mail routing